Clarification on Bayes' Theorem

ASK MARYLIN: FALSE POSITIVES

In one of Marilyn Savant's columns in parade Magazine the following question was asked.

Suppose we assume that 5% of the people are drug-users. The test is 95% accurate, which we'll say means that if a person is a user, the result is positive 95% of the time; and if s/he isn't, it's negative 95% of the time. A randomly chosen person tests positive. Is the individual highly likely to be a drug-user?

First suppose that there are 10000 people in the population.

"5% of the people are drug-users" implies:

 

Drug User

Not Drug User

 

Test Positive

     

Test Negative

     
 

500

9500

10000

" If a person is a user, the result is positive 95% of the time" implies:

 

Drug User

Not Drug User

 

Test Positive

475

   

Test Negative

25

   
 

500

9500

10000

"If s/he isn't, it's negative 95% of the time" implies:

 

Drug User

Not Drug User

 

Test Positive

475

475

 

Test Negative

25

9025

 
 

500

9500

10000

Therefore:

 

Drug User

Not Drug User

 

Test Positive

475

475

950

Test Negative

25

9025

9050

 

500

9500

10000

A randomly chosen person tests positive. What is the probability that s/he is a drug-user?

 

A randomly chosen person tests negative. What is the probability that s/he is not a drug-user?